🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a rethink. As time has passed, an observance that began as a commemorative event of the past, cultural identity and bonds between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate gatherings where Black people are compensated to address white audiences about “unconscious bias” and “allyship”. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the industry of displaying cultural sensitivity. Yet, that phase is now over. The tide has reached its height, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what raising awareness is for.

The Origins of Black History Month

First commemorated in the United States and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as an observance of African American heritage by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with seven days of commemoration and observance in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this initiative and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in autumn in the Britain, the Federal Republic of Germany, Ireland and the Holland.

The period has evolved since those days, focusing less on the narratives of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and more on influential individuals of color in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to mold society. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the observance is commemorated is a indication of the political moment. How it progresses is a good lesson in how assimilation leads to dismantling: the restructuring of Black History Month has stymied the objective of it, which is to tackle embedded and established prejudice.

---

A Disconcerting Period

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to rethink Black History Month more than the particular moment in which it takes place this year. In the UK, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is leading the polls. In the warmer months we witnessed the largest far-right rally in British history. the Conservative leader, the African descendant in charge of the Tory party, is a strong critic of anti-racism activism, and we are in a position where a member of parliament gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in specific city neighborhoods is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, ultra-nationalist movements are surging in the EU as a entirety.

In the US, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been brought, frequently with success, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to scrub the history of people of color and experience from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's first executive orders aimed at the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, alleging that they of a coordinated and broad attempt to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

In this context, the month represents how minimally it can be influential if it is limited to either routine organizational acknowledgments, or depoliticized festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its restricted time span means that it is disconnected from the broader ongoing work that is needed. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she expressed apprehension about the temporary “tokenism” of the observance. “The difficulty with embracing a superficial method”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month becomes a brief show rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to alter, change and broaden efforts for racial equality and recognition in such periods of dismay and anxiety is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with events including Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are relics of an period that has been ineffective.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a considerable labor has gone into. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month seem? To begin with, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed throughout the annual calendar (as various establishments are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade politics, and leaves space for people, particularly youth, to express their concerns and stories. What value has simple recognition of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of extreme conservative demonstrations in the public spaces? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but faced with the dangers that face all if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, critical, and responsive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Black History is Now Month.